Simon Willison's Weblog: astral

Thoughts on OpenAI acquiring Astral and uv/ruff/ty

2026-03-19T16:45:15+00:00

The big news this morning: Astral to join OpenAI (on the Astral blog) and OpenAI to acquire Astral (the OpenAI announcement). Astral are the company behind uv, ruff, and ty - three increasingly load-bearing open source projects in the Python ecosystem. I have thoughts!

The official line from OpenAI and Astral

The Astral team will become part of the Codex team at OpenAI.

Charlie Marsh has this to say:

Open source is at the heart of that impact and the heart of that story; it sits at the center of everything we do. In line with our philosophy and OpenAI's own announcement, OpenAI will continue supporting our open source tools after the deal closes. We'll keep building in the open, alongside our community -- and for the broader Python ecosystem -- just as we have from the start. [...]

After joining the Codex team, we'll continue building our open source tools, explore ways they can work more seamlessly with Codex, and expand our reach to think more broadly about the future of software development.

OpenAI's message has a slightly different focus (highlights mine):

As part of our developer-first philosophy, after closing OpenAI plans to support Astral’s open source products. By bringing Astral’s tooling and engineering expertise to OpenAI, we will accelerate our work on Codex and expand what AI can do across the software development lifecycle.

This is a slightly confusing message. The Codex CLI is a Rust application, and Astral have some of the best Rust engineers in the industry - BurntSushi alone (Rust regex, ripgrep, jiff) may be worth the price of acquisition!

So is this about the talent or about the product? I expect both, but I know from past experience that a product+talent acquisition can turn into a talent-only acquisition later on.

uv is the big one

Of Astral's projects the most impactful is uv. If you're not familiar with it, uv is by far the most convincing solution to Python's environment management problems, best illustrated by this classic XKCD:

Switch from python to uv run and most of these problems go away. I've been using it extensively for the past couple of years and it's become an essential part of my workflow.

I'm not alone in this. According to PyPI Stats uv was downloaded more than 126 million times last month! Since its release in February 2024 - just two years ago - it's become one of the most popular tools for running Python code.

Ruff and ty

Astral's two other big projects are ruff - a Python linter and formatter - and ty - a fast Python type checker.

These are popular tools that provide a great developer experience but they aren't load-bearing in the same way that uv is.

They do however resonate well with coding agent tools like Codex - giving an agent access to fast linting and type checking tools can help improve the quality of the code they generate.

I'm not convinced that integrating them into the coding agent itself as opposed to telling it when to run them will make a meaningful difference, but I may just not be imaginative enough here.

What of pyx?

Ever since uv started to gain traction the Python community has been worrying about the strategic risk of a single VC-backed company owning a key piece of Python infrastructure. I wrote about one of those conversations in detail back in September 2024.

The conversation back then focused on what Astral's business plan could be, which started to take form in August 2025 when they announced pyx, their private PyPI-style package registry for organizations.

I'm less convinced that pyx makes sense within OpenAI, and it's notably absent from both the Astral and OpenAI announcement posts.

Competitive dynamics

An interesting aspect of this deal is how it might impact the competition between Anthropic and OpenAI.

Both companies spent most of 2025 focused on improving the coding ability of their models, resulting in the November 2025 inflection point when coding agents went from often-useful to almost-indispensable tools for software development.

The competition between Anthropic's Claude Code and OpenAI's Codex is fierce. Those $200/month subscriptions add up to billions of dollars a year in revenue, for companies that very much need that money.

Anthropic acquired the Bun JavaScript runtime in December 2025, an acquisition that looks somewhat similar in shape to Astral.

Bun was already a core component of Claude Code and that acquisition looked to mainly be about ensuring that a crucial dependency stayed actively maintained. Claude Code's performance has increased significantly since then thanks to the efforts of Bun's Jarred Sumner.

One bad version of this deal would be if OpenAI start using their ownership of uv as leverage in their competition with Anthropic.

Astral's quiet series A and B

One detail that caught my eye from Astral's announcement, in the section thanking the team, investors, and community:

Second, to our investors, especially Casey Aylward from Accel, who led our Seed and Series A, and Jennifer Li from Andreessen Horowitz, who led our Series B. As a first-time, technical, solo founder, you showed far more belief in me than I ever showed in myself, and I will never forget that.

As far as I can tell neither the Series A nor the Series B were previously announced - I've only been able to find coverage of the original seed round from April 2023.

Those investors presumably now get to exchange their stake in Astral for a piece of OpenAI. I wonder how much influence they had on Astral's decision to sell.

Forking as a credible exit?

Armin Ronacher built Rye, which was later taken over by Astral and effectively merged with uv. In August 2024 he wrote about the risk involved in a VC-backed company owning a key piece of open source infrastructure and said the following (highlight mine):

However having seen the code and what uv is doing, even in the worst possible future this is a very forkable and maintainable thing. I believe that even in case Astral shuts down or were to do something incredibly dodgy licensing wise, the community would be better off than before uv existed.

Astral's own Douglas Creager emphasized this angle on Hacker News today:

All I can say is that right now, we're committed to maintaining our open-source tools with the same level of effort, care, and attention to detail as before. That does not change with this acquisition. No one can guarantee how motives, incentives, and decisions might change years down the line. But that's why we bake optionality into it with the tools being permissively licensed. That makes the worst-case scenarios have the shape of "fork and move on", and not "software disappears forever".

I like and trust the Astral team and I'm optimistic that their projects will be well-maintained in their new home.

OpenAI don't yet have much of a track record with respect to acquiring and maintaining open source projects. They've been on a bit of an acquisition spree over the past three months though, snapping up Promptfoo and OpenClaw (sort-of, they hired creator Peter Steinberger and are spinning OpenClaw off to a foundation), plus closed source LaTeX platform Crixet (now Prism).

If things do go south for uv and the other Astral projects we'll get to see how credible the forking exit strategy turns out to be.

Tags: python, ai, rust, openai, ruff, uv, astral, charlie-marsh, coding-agents, codex-cli, ty

ty: An extremely fast Python type checker and LSP

2025-12-16T23:35:33+00:00

ty: An extremely fast Python type checker and LSP

The team at Astral have been working on this for quite a long time, and are finally releasing the first beta. They have some big performance claims:

Without caching, ty is consistently between 10x and 60x faster than mypy and Pyright. When run in an editor, the gap is even more dramatic. As an example, after editing a load-bearing file in the PyTorch repository, ty recomputes diagnostics in 4.7ms: 80x faster than Pyright (386ms) and 500x faster than Pyrefly (2.38 seconds). ty is very fast!

The easiest way to try it out is via uvx:

cd my-python-project/
uvx ty check

I tried it against sqlite-utils and it turns out I have quite a lot of work to do!

Astral also released a new VS Code extension adding ty-powered language server features like go to definition. I'm still getting my head around how this works and what it can do.

Via Hacker News

Tags: python, vs-code, astral, ty

pyx: a Python-native package registry, now in Beta

2025-08-13T18:36:51+00:00

pyx: a Python-native package registry, now in Beta

Since its first release, the single biggest question around the uv Python environment management tool has been around Astral's business model: Astral are a VC-backed company and at some point they need to start making real revenue.

Back in September Astral founder Charlie Marsh said the following:

I don't want to charge people money to use our tools, and I don't want to create an incentive structure whereby our open source offerings are competing with any commercial offerings (which is what you see with a lost of hosted-open-source-SaaS business models).

What I want to do is build software that vertically integrates with our open source tools, and sell that software to companies that are already using Ruff, uv, etc. Alternatives to things that companies already pay for today.

An example of what this might look like (we may not do this, but it's helpful to have a concrete example of the strategy) would be something like an enterprise-focused private package registry. [...]

It looks like those plans have become concrete now! From today's announcement:

TL;DR: pyx is a Python-native package registry --- and the first piece of the Astral platform, our next-generation infrastructure for the Python ecosystem.

We think of pyx as an optimized backend for uv: it's a package registry, but it also solves problems that go beyond the scope of a traditional "package registry", making your Python experience faster, more secure, and even GPU-aware, both for private packages and public sources (like PyPI and the PyTorch index).

pyx is live with our early partners, including Ramp, Intercom, and fal [...]

This looks like a sensible direction to me, and one that stays true to Charlie's promises to carefully design the incentive structure to avoid corrupting the core open source project that the Python community is coming to depend on.

Via @charliermarsh

Tags: open-source, packaging, python, uv, astral, charlie-marsh

astral-sh/ty

2025-05-07T18:37:33+00:00

astral-sh/ty

Astral have been working on this "extremely fast Python type checker and language server, written in Rust" quietly but in-the-open for a while now. Here's the first alpha public release - albeit not yet announced - as ty on PyPI (nice donated two-letter name!)

You can try it out via uvx like this - run the command in a folder full of Python code and see what comes back:

uvx ty check

I got zero errors for my recent, simple condense-json library and a ton of errors for my more mature sqlite-utils library - output here.

It really is fast:

cd /tmp
git clone https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils
cd sqlite-utils
time uvx ty check

Reports it running in around a tenth of a second (0.109 total wall time) using multiple CPU cores:

uvx ty check  0.18s user 0.07s system 228% cpu 0.109 total

Running time uvx mypy . in the same folder (both after first ensuring the underlying tools had been cached) took around 7x longer:

uvx mypy .  0.46s user 0.09s system 74% cpu 0.740 total

This isn't a fair comparison yet as ty still isn't feature complete in comparison to mypy.

Via Hacker News

Tags: pypi, python, rust, mypy, uv, astral, ty

Quoting Kevin Samuel

2025-02-15T20:10:23+00:00

[...] if your situation allows it, always try uv first. Then fall back on something else if that doesn’t work out.

It is the Pareto solution because it's easier than trying to figure out what you should do and you will rarely regret it. Indeed, the cost of moving to and from it is low, but the value it delivers is quite high.

— Kevin Samuel, Bite code!

Tags: python, uv, astral

python-build-standalone now has Python 3.14.0a5

2025-02-13T06:25:24+00:00

python-build-standalone now has Python 3.14.0a5

Exciting news from Charlie Marsh:

We just shipped the latest Python 3.14 alpha (3.14.0a5) to uv and python-build-standalone. This is the first release that includes the tail-calling interpreter.

Our initial benchmarks show a ~20-30% performance improvement across CPython.

This is an optimization that was first discussed in faster-cpython in January 2024, then landed earlier this month by Ken Jin and included in the 3.14a05 release. The alpha release notes say:

A new type of interpreter based on tail calls has been added to CPython. For certain newer compilers, this interpreter provides significantly better performance. Preliminary numbers on our machines suggest anywhere from -3% to 30% faster Python code, and a geometric mean of 9-15% faster on pyperformance depending on platform and architecture. The baseline is Python 3.14 built with Clang 19 without this new interpreter.

This interpreter currently only works with Clang 19 and newer on x86-64 and AArch64 architectures. However, we expect that a future release of GCC will support this as well.

Including this in python-build-standalone means it's now trivial to try out via uv. I upgraded to the latest uv like this:

pip install -U uv

Then ran uv python list to see the available versions:

cpython-3.14.0a5+freethreaded-macos-aarch64-none    <download available>
cpython-3.14.0a5-macos-aarch64-none                 <download available>
cpython-3.13.2+freethreaded-macos-aarch64-none      <download available>
cpython-3.13.2-macos-aarch64-none                   <download available>
cpython-3.13.1-macos-aarch64-none                   /opt/homebrew/opt/python@3.13/bin/python3.13 -> ../Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.13/bin/python3.13

I downloaded the new alpha like this:

uv python install cpython-3.14.0a5

And tried it out like so:

uv run --python 3.14.0a5 python

The Astral team have been using Ken's bm_pystones.py benchmarks script. I grabbed a copy like this:

wget 'https://gist.githubusercontent.com/Fidget-Spinner/e7bf204bf605680b0fc1540fe3777acf/raw/fa85c0f3464021a683245f075505860db5e8ba6b/bm_pystones.py'

And ran it with uv:

uv run --python 3.14.0a5 bm_pystones.py

Giving:

Pystone(1.1) time for 50000 passes = 0.0511138
This machine benchmarks at 978209 pystones/second

Inspired by Charlie's example I decided to try the hyperfine benchmarking tool, which can run multiple commands to statistically compare their performance. I came up with this recipe:

brew install hyperfine
hyperfine \                            
  "uv run --python 3.14.0a5 bm_pystones.py" \
  "uv run --python 3.13 bm_pystones.py" \
  -n tail-calling \
  -n baseline \
  --warmup 10

So 3.14.0a5 scored 1.12 times faster than 3.13 on the benchmark (on my extremely overloaded M2 MacBook Pro).

Tags: benchmarks, python, uv, astral

Quoting Charlie Marsh

2025-01-29T18:53:56+00:00

We’re building a new static type checker for Python, from scratch, in Rust. From a technical perspective, it’s probably our most ambitious project yet. We’re about 800 PRs deep!

Like Ruff and uv, there will be a significant focus on performance. The entire system is designed to be highly incremental so that it can eventually power a language server (e.g., only re-analyze affected files on code change). [...]

We haven't publicized it to-date, but all of this work has been happening in the open, in the Ruff repository.

— Charlie Marsh

Tags: python, rust, ruff, uv, astral, charlie-marsh

Transferring Python Build Standalone Stewardship to Astral

2024-12-03T23:18:37+00:00

Transferring Python Build Standalone Stewardship to Astral

Gregory Szorc's Python Standalone Builds have been quietly running an increasing portion of the Python ecosystem for a few years now, but really accelerated in importance when uv started using them for new Python installations managed by that tool. The releases (shipped via GitHub) have now been downloaded over 70 million times, 50 million of those since uv's initial release in March of this year.

uv maintainers Astral have been helping out with PSB maintenance for a while:

When I told Charlie I could use assistance supporting PBS, Astral employees started contributing to the project. They have built out various functionality, including Python 3.13 support (including free-threaded builds), turnkey automated release publishing, and debug symbol stripped builds to further reduce the download/install size. Multiple Astral employees now have GitHub permissions to approve/merge PRs and publish releases. All releases since April have been performed by Astral employees.

As-of December 17th Gregory will be transferring the project to the Astral organization, while staying on as a maintainer and advisor. Here's Astral's post about this: A new home for python-build-standalone.

Tags: python, uv, astral

TIL: Using uv to develop Python command-line applications

2024-10-24T05:56:21+00:00

TIL: Using uv to develop Python command-line applications

I've been increasingly using uv to try out new software (via uvx) and experiment with new ideas, but I hadn't quite figured out the right way to use it for developing my own projects.

It turns out I was missing a few things - in particular the fact that there's no need to use uv pip at all when working with a local development environment, you can get by entirely on uv run (and maybe uv sync --extra test to install test dependencies) with no direct invocations of uv pip at all.

I bounced a few questions off Charlie Marsh and filled in the missing gaps - this TIL shows my new uv-powered process for hacking on Python CLI apps built using Click and my simonw/click-app cookecutter template.

Tags: cli, packaging, pip, python, til, cookiecutter, uv, astral, charlie-marsh

[red-knot] type inference/checking test framework

2024-10-16T20:43:55+00:00

[red-knot] type inference/checking test framework

Ruff maintainer Carl Meyer recently landed an interesting new design for a testing framework. It's based on Markdown, and could be described as a form of "literate testing" - the testing equivalent of Donald Knuth's literate programming.

A markdown test file is a suite of tests, each test can contain one or more Python files, with optionally specified path/name. The test writes all files to an in-memory file system, runs red-knot, and matches the resulting diagnostics against Type: and Error: assertions embedded in the Python source as comments.

Test suites are Markdown documents with embedded fenced blocks that look like this:

```py
reveal_type(1.0) # revealed: float
```

Tests can optionally include a path= specifier, which can provide neater messages when reporting test failures:

```py path=branches_unify_to_non_union_type.py
def could_raise_returns_str() -> str:
    return 'foo'
...
```

A larger example test suite can be browsed in the red_knot_python_semantic/resources/mdtest directory.

This document on control flow for exception handlers (from this PR) is the best example I've found of detailed prose documentation to accompany the tests.

The system is implemented in Rust, but it's easy to imagine an alternative version of this idea written in Python as a pytest plugin. This feels like an evolution of the old Python doctest idea, except that tests are embedded directly in Markdown rather than being embedded in Python code docstrings.

... and it looks like such plugins exist already. Here are two that I've found so far:

pytest-markdown-docs by Elias Freider and Modal Labs.
sphinx.ext.doctest is a core Sphinx extension for running test snippets in documentation.
pytest-doctestplus from the Scientific Python community, first released in 2011.

I tried pytest-markdown-docs by creating a doc.md file like this:

# Hello test doc

```py
assert 1 + 2 == 3
```

But this fails:

```py
assert 1 + 2 == 4
```

And then running it with uvx like this:

uvx --with pytest-markdown-docs pytest --markdown-docs

I got one pass and one fail:

_______ docstring for /private/tmp/doc.md __________
Error in code block:
```
10   assert 1 + 2 == 4
11   
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/private/tmp/tt/doc.md", line 10, in <module>
    assert 1 + 2 == 4
AssertionError

============= short test summary info ==============
FAILED doc.md::/private/tmp/doc.md
=========== 1 failed, 1 passed in 0.02s ============

I also just learned that the venerable Python doctest standard library module has the ability to run tests in documentation files too, with doctest.testfile("example.txt"): "The file content is treated as if it were a single giant docstring; the file doesn’t need to contain a Python program!"

Via Charlie Marsh

Tags: python, testing, markdown, rust, pytest, ruff, uv, astral, donald-knuth

UV — I am (somewhat) sold

2024-09-15T14:54:04+00:00

UV — I am (somewhat) sold

Oliver Andrich's detailed notes on adopting uv. Oliver has some pretty specific requirements:

I need to have various Python versions installed locally to test my work and my personal projects. Ranging from Python 3.8 to 3.13. [...] I also require decent dependency management in my projects that goes beyond manually editing a pyproject.toml file. Likewise, I am way too accustomed to poetry add .... And I run a number of Python-based tools --- djhtml, poetry, ipython, llm, mkdocs, pre-commit, tox, ...

He's braver than I am!

I started by removing all Python installations, pyenv, pipx and Homebrew from my machine. Rendering me unable to do my work.

Here's a neat trick: first install a specific Python version with uv like this:

uv python install 3.11

Then create an alias to run it like this:

alias python3.11 'uv run --python=3.11 python3'

And install standalone tools with optional extra dependencies like this (a replacement for pipx and pipx inject):

uv tool install --python=3.12 --with mkdocs-material mkdocs

Oliver also links to Anže Pečar's handy guide on using UV with Django.

Via Jeff Triplett

Tags: django, packaging, python, uv, astral

uv under discussion on Mastodon

2024-09-08T16:23:31+00:00

uv under discussion on Mastodon

Jacob Kaplan-Moss kicked off this fascinating conversation about uv on Mastodon recently. It's worth reading the whole thing, which includes input from a whole range of influential Python community members such as Jeff Triplett, Glyph Lefkowitz, Russell Keith-Magee, Seth Michael Larson, Hynek Schlawack, James Bennett and others. (Mastodon is a pretty great place for keeping up with the Python community these days.)

The key theme of the conversation is that, while uv represents a huge set of potential improvements to the Python ecosystem, it comes with additional risks due its attachment to a VC-backed company - and its reliance on Rust rather than Python.

Here are a few comments that stood out to me.

Russell:

As enthusiastic as I am about the direction uv is going, I haven't adopted them anywhere - because I want very much to understand Astral’s intended business model before I hook my wagon to their tools. It's definitely not clear to me how they're going to stay liquid once the VC money runs out. They could get me onboard in a hot second if they published a "This is what we're planning to charge for" blog post.

Hynek:

As much as I hate VC, [...] FOSS projects flame out all the time too. If Frost loses interest, there’s no PDM anymore. Same for Ofek and Hatch(ling).

I fully expect Astral to flame out and us having to fork/take over—it’s the circle of FOSS. To me uv looks like a genius sting to trick VCs into paying to fix packaging. We’ll be better off either way.

Glyph:

Even in the best case, Rust is more expensive and difficult to maintain, not to mention "non-native" to the average customer here. [...] And the difficulty with VC money here is that it can burn out all the other projects in the ecosystem simultaneously, creating a risk of monoculture, where previously, I think we can say that "monoculture" was the least of Python's packaging concerns.

Hynek on Rust:

I don’t think y’all quite grok what uv makes so special due to your seniority. The speed is really cool, but the reason Rust is elemental is that it’s one compiled blob that can be used to bootstrap and maintain a Python development. A blob that will never break because someone upgraded Homebrew, ran pip install or any other creative way people found to fuck up their installations. Python has shown to be a terrible tech to maintain Python.

Christopher Neugebauer:

Just dropping in here to say that corporate capture of the Python ecosystem is the #1 keeps-me-up-at-night subject in my community work, so I watch Astral with interest, even if I'm not yet too worried.

I'm reminded of this note from Armin Ronacher, who created Rye and later donated it to uv maintainers Astral:

However having seen the code and what uv is doing, even in the worst possible future this is a very forkable and maintainable thing. I believe that even in case Astral shuts down or were to do something incredibly dodgy licensing wise, the community would be better off than before uv existed.

I'm currently inclined to agree with Armin and Hynek: while the risk of corporate capture for a crucial aspect of the Python packaging and onboarding ecosystem is a legitimate concern, the amount of progress that has been made here in a relatively short time combined with the open license and quality of the underlying code keeps me optimistic that uv will be a net positive for Python overall.

Update: uv creator Charlie Marsh joined the conversation:

I don't want to charge people money to use our tools, and I don't want to create an incentive structure whereby our open source offerings are competing with any commercial offerings (which is what you see with a lost of hosted-open-source-SaaS business models).

What I want to do is build software that vertically integrates with our open source tools, and sell that software to companies that are already using Ruff, uv, etc. Alternatives to things that companies already pay for today.

An example of what this might look like (we may not do this, but it's helpful to have a concrete example of the strategy) would be something like an enterprise-focused private package registry. A lot of big companies use uv. We spend time talking to them. They all spend money on private package registries, and have issues with them. We could build a private registry that integrates well with uv, and sell it to those companies. [...]

But the core of what I want to do is this: build great tools, hopefully people like them, hopefully they grow, hopefully companies adopt them; then sell software to those companies that represents the natural next thing they need when building with Python. Hopefully we can build something better than the alternatives by playing well with our OSS, and hopefully we are the natural choice if they're already using our OSS.

Tags: armin-ronacher, jacob-kaplan-moss, open-source, packaging, python, russell-keith-magee, rust, hynek-schlawack, mastodon, glyph, uv, astral, charlie-marsh, seth-michael-larson

Quoting Armin Ronacher

2024-08-21T12:08:15+00:00

There is an elephant in the room which is that Astral is a VC funded company. What does that mean for the future of these tools? Here is my take on this: for the community having someone pour money into it can create some challenges. For the PSF and the core Python project this is something that should be considered. However having seen the code and what uv is doing, even in the worst possible future this is a very forkable and maintainable thing. I believe that even in case Astral shuts down or were to do something incredibly dodgy licensing wise, the community would be better off than before uv existed.

— Armin Ronacher

Tags: armin-ronacher, open-source, python, rye, uv, astral

uv: Unified Python packaging

2024-08-20T22:45:16+00:00

uv: Unified Python packaging

Huge new release from the Astral team today. uv 0.3.0 adds a bewildering array of new features, as part of their attempt to build "Cargo, for Python".

It's going to take a while to fully absorb all of this. Some of the key new features are:

uv tool run cowsay, aliased to uvx cowsay - a pipx alternative that runs a tool in its own dedicated virtual environment (tucked away in ~/Library/Caches/uv), installing it if it's not present. It has a neat --with option for installing extras - I tried that just now with uvx --with datasette-cluster-map datasette and it ran Datasette with the datasette-cluster-map plugin installed.
Project management, as an alternative to tools like Poetry and PDM. uv init creates a pyproject.toml file in the current directory, uv add sqlite-utils then creates and activates a .venv virtual environment, adds the package to that pyproject.toml and adds all of its dependencies to a new uv.lock file (like this one). That uv.lock is described as a universal or cross-platform lockfile that can support locking dependencies for multiple platforms.
Single-file script execution using uv run myscript.py, where those scripts can define their own dependencies using PEP 723 inline metadata. These dependencies are listed in a specially formatted comment and will be installed into a virtual environment before the script is executed.
Python version management similar to pyenv. The new uv python list command lists all Python versions available on your system (including detecting various system and Homebrew installations), and uv python install 3.13 can then install a uv-managed Python using Gregory Szorc's invaluable python-build-standalone releases.

It's all accompanied by new and very thorough documentation.

The paint isn't even dry on this stuff - it's only been out for a few hours - but this feels very promising to me. The idea that you can install uv (a single Rust binary) and then start running all of these commands to manage Python installations and their dependencies is very appealing.

If you’re wondering about the relationship between this and Rye - another project that Astral adopted solving a subset of these problems - this forum thread clarifies that they intend to continue maintaining Rye but are eager for uv to work as a full replacement.

Via @charliermarsh

Tags: packaging, python, rust, rye, uv, astral

uv pip install --exclude-newer example

2024-05-10T16:35:40+00:00

uv pip install --exclude-newer example

A neat new feature of the uv pip install command is the --exclude-newer option, which can be used to avoid installing any package versions released after the specified date.

Here's a clever example of that in use from the typing_extensions packages CI tests that run against some downstream packages:

uv pip install --system -r test-requirements.txt --exclude-newer $(git show -s --date=format:'%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ' --format=%cd HEAD)

They use git show to get the date of the most recent commit (%cd means commit date) formatted as an ISO timestamp, then pass that to --exclude-newer.

Via @hauntsaninja

Tags: git, pip, python, uv, astral

Ruff v0.4.0: a hand-written recursive descent parser for Python

2024-04-19T05:00:26+00:00

Ruff v0.4.0: a hand-written recursive descent parser for Python

The latest release of Ruff—a Python linter and formatter, written in Rust—includes a complete rewrite of the core parser. Previously Ruff used a parser borrowed from RustPython, generated using the LALRPOP parser generator. Victor Hugo Gomes contributed a new parser written from scratch, which provided a 2x speedup and also added error recovery, allowing parsing of invalid Python—super-useful for a linter.

I tried Ruff 0.4.0 just now against Datasette—a reasonably large Python project—and it ran in less than 1/10th of a second. This thing is Fast.

Tags: compilers, python, rust, ruff, astral

uv: Python packaging in Rust

2024-02-15T19:57:13+00:00

uv: Python packaging in Rust

"uv is an extremely fast Python package installer and resolver, written in Rust, and designed as a drop-in replacement for pip and pip-tools workflows."

From Charlie Marsh and Astral, the team behind Ruff, who describe it as a milestone in their pursuit of a "Cargo for Python".

Also in this announcement: Astral are taking over stewardship of Armin Ronacher's Rye packaging tool, another Rust project.

uv is reported to be 8-10x faster than regular pip, increasing to 80-115x faster with a warm global module cache thanks to copy-on-write and hard links on supported filesystems - which saves on disk space too.

It also has a --resolution=lowest option for installing the lowest available version of dependencies - extremely useful for testing, I've been wanting this for my own projects for a while.

Also included: uv venv - a fast tool for creating new virtual environments with no dependency on Python itself.

Via @charliermarsh

Tags: armin-ronacher, pip, python, rust, rye, ruff, uv, astral, charlie-marsh