http://simonwillison.net/2007-08-14T10:42:34+00:00Simon Willison2007-08-14T10:42:34+00:002007-08-14T10:42:34+00:00https://simonwillison.net/2007/Aug/14/blueprints/#atom-tag

<blockquote cite="http://playgroundblues.com/posts/2007/aug/10/blueprints-are-not-final/"><p>[On Blueprint] I'm somewhat conflicted with its release because I don't think it should be used. Don't get me wrong, it's great, but don't use it.</p></blockquote> <p class="cite">&mdash; <a href="http://playgroundblues.com/posts/2007/aug/10/blueprints-are-not-final/">Nathan Borror</a></p> <p>Tags: <a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/blueprint">blueprint</a>, <a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/css">css</a>, <a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/nathan-borror">nathan-borror</a>, <a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/structuralclasses">structuralclasses</a></p>

2007-08-13T12:01:10+00:002007-08-13T12:01:10+00:00https://simonwillison.net/2007/Aug/13/blueprint/#atom-tag

<p><strong><a href="http://www.markboulton.co.uk/journal/comments/blueprint_a_css_framework/">Blueprint. A CSS Framework.</a></strong></p> I’ve been trying to articulate why I’ve started to think that structural class names are a necessary evil in the comments. <p>Tags: <a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/blueprint">blueprint</a>, <a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/css">css</a>, <a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/mark-boulton">mark-boulton</a>, <a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/structuralclasses">structuralclasses</a></p>