<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en-us" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Simon Willison's Weblog: cartography</title><link href="http://simonwillison.net/" rel="alternate"/><link href="http://simonwillison.net/tags/cartography.atom" rel="self"/><id>http://simonwillison.net/</id><updated>2017-12-23T09:35:25+00:00</updated><author><name>Simon Willison</name></author><entry><title>Google Maps’s Moat</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2017/Dec/23/google-maps-moat/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2017-12-23T09:35:25+00:00</published><updated>2017-12-23T09:35:25+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2017/Dec/23/google-maps-moat/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.justinobeirne.com/google-maps-moat"&gt;Google Maps’s Moat&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
Gorgeous essay by digital cartographer Justin O’Beirne, exploring how Google Maps has evolved over time and how the fantastically useful “areas of interest” feature (where commercial corridors and business districts are automatically highlighted) uses data derived from a combination of Street View business data and 3D building outlines derived from aerial imagery.


    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/cartography"&gt;cartography&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/google-maps"&gt;google-maps&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/streetview"&gt;streetview&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="cartography"/><category term="google-maps"/><category term="streetview"/></entry><entry><title>Google Maps and Label Readability</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2010/Dec/3/cartography/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2010-12-03T17:08:00+00:00</published><updated>2010-12-03T17:08:00+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2010/Dec/3/cartography/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.41latitude.com/post/2072504768/google-maps-label-readability"&gt;Google Maps and Label Readability&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
Obsessively detailed analysis of exactly what makes Google Maps so readable when compared to Yahoo! and Bing.


    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/cartography"&gt;cartography&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/google-maps"&gt;google-maps&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/recovered"&gt;recovered&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="cartography"/><category term="google-maps"/><category term="recovered"/></entry><entry><title>Best of OpenStreetMap</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2009/Aug/13/osm/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2009-08-13T12:30:05+00:00</published><updated>2009-08-13T12:30:05+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2009/Aug/13/osm/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://bestofosm.org/"&gt;Best of OpenStreetMap&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
I keep on telling people OpenStreetMap is this year’s Wikipedia—at its best, it beats commercially available maps. This “best of” site highlights the areas where OSM really shines (the yellow stars)—the German mapping community in particular have produced some outstanding cartography.

    &lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;Via &lt;a href="http://www.opengeodata.org/?p=647"&gt;OpenGeoData&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/cartography"&gt;cartography&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/mapping"&gt;mapping&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/maps"&gt;maps&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/openstreetmap"&gt;openstreetmap&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/wikipedia"&gt;wikipedia&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="cartography"/><category term="mapping"/><category term="maps"/><category term="openstreetmap"/><category term="wikipedia"/></entry></feed>