<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en-us" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Simon Willison's Weblog: david-cahn</title><link href="http://simonwillison.net/" rel="alternate"/><link href="http://simonwillison.net/tags/david-cahn.atom" rel="self"/><id>http://simonwillison.net/</id><updated>2024-07-28T10:40:40+00:00</updated><author><name>Simon Willison</name></author><entry><title>Quoting David Cahn</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2024/Jul/28/david-cahn/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2024-07-28T10:40:40+00:00</published><updated>2024-07-28T10:40:40+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2024/Jul/28/david-cahn/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    &lt;blockquote cite="https://www.sequoiacap.com/article/ai-optimism-vs-ai-arms-race/"&gt;&lt;p&gt;The key to understanding the pace of today’s infrastructure buildout is to recognize that while AI optimism is certainly a driver of AI CapEx, it is not the only one. The cloud players exist in a ruthless oligopoly with intense competition. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Every time Microsoft escalates, Amazon is motivated to escalate to keep up. And vice versa. We are now in a cycle of competitive escalation between three of the biggest companies in the history of the world, collectively worth more than $7T. At each cycle of the escalation, there is an easy justification—we have plenty of money to afford this. With more commitment comes more confidence, and this loop becomes self-reinforcing. Supply constraints turbocharge this dynamic: If you don’t acquire land, power and labor now, someone else will.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p class="cite"&gt;&amp;mdash; &lt;a href="https://www.sequoiacap.com/article/ai-optimism-vs-ai-arms-race/"&gt;David Cahn&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/ai"&gt;ai&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/david-cahn"&gt;david-cahn&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="ai"/><category term="david-cahn"/></entry><entry><title>Quoting David Cahn</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2024/Jul/3/david-cahn/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2024-07-03T20:49:06+00:00</published><updated>2024-07-03T20:49:06+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2024/Jul/3/david-cahn/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    &lt;blockquote cite="https://www.sequoiacap.com/article/ais-600b-question/"&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you own the tracks between San Francisco and Los Angeles, you likely have some kind of monopolistic pricing power, because there can only be so many tracks laid between place A and place B. In the case of GPU data centers, there is much less pricing power. GPU computing is increasingly turning into a commodity, metered per hour. Unlike the CPU cloud, which became an oligopoly, new entrants building dedicated AI clouds continue to flood the market. Without a monopoly or oligopoly, high fixed cost + low marginal cost businesses almost always see prices competed down to marginal cost (e.g., airlines).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p class="cite"&gt;&amp;mdash; &lt;a href="https://www.sequoiacap.com/article/ais-600b-question/"&gt;David Cahn&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/economics"&gt;economics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/ai"&gt;ai&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/david-cahn"&gt;david-cahn&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/gpus"&gt;gpus&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="economics"/><category term="ai"/><category term="david-cahn"/><category term="gpus"/></entry></feed>