<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en-us" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Simon Willison's Weblog: lawrence-lessig</title><link href="http://simonwillison.net/" rel="alternate"/><link href="http://simonwillison.net/tags/lawrence-lessig.atom" rel="self"/><id>http://simonwillison.net/</id><updated>2017-10-09T15:25:16+00:00</updated><author><name>Simon Willison</name></author><entry><title>What happened: Hillary’s view</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2017/Oct/9/lessig/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2017-10-09T15:25:16+00:00</published><updated>2017-10-09T15:25:16+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2017/Oct/9/lessig/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://medium.com/@lessig/what-happened-hillarys-view-7535b0f18932"&gt;What happened: Hillary’s view&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
Lawrence Lessig’s review of Hillary Clinton’s book, including his thoughts on the failures of commercial media in covering the story of Russian interference during those  crucial closing weeks before the election.


    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/lawrence-lessig"&gt;lawrence-lessig&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="lawrence-lessig"/></entry><entry><title>Free licenses upheld by US "IP" court</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2008/Aug/14/huge/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2008-08-14T09:33:49+00:00</published><updated>2008-08-14T09:33:49+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2008/Aug/14/huge/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://lessig.org/blog/2008/08/huge_and_important_news_free_l.html"&gt;Free licenses upheld by US &amp;quot;IP&amp;quot; court&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
Free software and CC licenses which dictate conditions that, when violated, turn you in to a copyright infringer now have precedence in US law.


    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/copyright"&gt;copyright&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/creative-commons"&gt;creative-commons&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/freesoftware"&gt;freesoftware&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/law"&gt;law&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/lawrence-lessig"&gt;lawrence-lessig&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/licensing"&gt;licensing&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/open-source"&gt;open-source&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/uslaw"&gt;uslaw&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="copyright"/><category term="creative-commons"/><category term="freesoftware"/><category term="law"/><category term="lawrence-lessig"/><category term="licensing"/><category term="open-source"/><category term="uslaw"/></entry><entry><title>Lawrence Lessig on the West Wing</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2005/Feb/10/lawrence/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2005-02-10T12:36:03+00:00</published><updated>2005-02-10T12:36:03+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2005/Feb/10/lawrence/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://a.wholelottanothing.org/2005/02/reverend_jim_as.html"&gt;Lawrence Lessig on the West Wing&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
Rather strange. Leaves you wondering where he left his flux capacitator.


    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/lawrence-lessig"&gt;lawrence-lessig&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="lawrence-lessig"/></entry><entry><title>The Black and White about Grey Tuesday</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2004/Feb/24/black/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2004-02-24T18:33:16+00:00</published><updated>2004-02-24T18:33:16+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2004/Feb/24/black/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lessig.org/blog/archives/001754.shtml"&gt;The Black and White about Grey Tuesday&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
Lessig on Illegal Art.

    &lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;Via &lt;a href="http://www.davextreme.com/davextreme/2004/02/gray_tuesday.html"&gt;David Ely: Gray Tuesday&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/lawrence-lessig"&gt;lawrence-lessig&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="lawrence-lessig"/></entry><entry><title>Eldred Act Reasoning</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2003/Jun/17/eldred/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2003-06-17T20:04:57+00:00</published><updated>2003-06-17T20:04:57+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2003/Jun/17/eldred/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    &lt;p&gt;Lawrence Lessig &lt;a href="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/lessig/blog/archives/2003_06.shtml#001291" title="firstmonday on eldred"&gt;explains&lt;/a&gt; why the proposed &lt;a href="http://eldred.cc/"&gt;Eldred Act&lt;/a&gt; does not go further in its aims to reclaim the public domain.&lt;/p&gt;
    
        &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/lawrence-lessig"&gt;lawrence-lessig&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
    

</summary><category term="lawrence-lessig"/></entry><entry><title>The Eric Eldred act</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2003/Jan/18/theEricEldredAct/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2003-01-18T16:29:02+00:00</published><updated>2003-01-18T16:29:02+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2003/Jan/18/theEricEldredAct/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    &lt;p&gt;Larry Lessig has a new campaign: a "copyright tax" that kicks in 50 years in to a copyright term, demanding copyright owners to pay a nominal fee ($1 - $50) to maintain control of their copyright. Unused works that are no longer profitable should then default to falling in to the public domain, while more commercial works can stay copyrighted. Larry's idea was first announced in this &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/18/opinion/18LESS.html?ex=1043470800&amp;amp;en=97d153dccaa9d220&amp;amp;ei=5007&amp;amp;partner=USERLAND" title="Protecting Mickey Mouse at Art&amp;apos;s Expense"&gt;New York Times Op-Ed&lt;/a&gt; and is also covered on &lt;a href="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/lessig/blog/archives/2003_01.shtml#000882" title="on building rather than suing: The Eric Eldred Act"&gt;Lessig's blog&lt;/a&gt;. He has also published an &lt;a href="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/lessig/blog/archives/EAFAQ.html" title="The Eric Eldred Act FAQ"&gt;FAQ&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
    
        &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/lawrence-lessig"&gt;lawrence-lessig&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
    

</summary><category term="lawrence-lessig"/></entry><entry><title>Creative Commons copyright link</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2002/Dec/19/creativeCommonsCopyrightLink/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2002-12-19T00:41:31+00:00</published><updated>2002-12-19T00:41:31+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2002/Dec/19/creativeCommonsCopyrightLink/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    &lt;p&gt;It's great to see the &lt;a href="http://creativecommons.org/"&gt;Creative Commons&lt;/a&gt; getting an overwhelmingly positive reception - as Lessig &lt;a href="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/lessig/blog/archives/2002_12.shtml#000737" title="cc launch"&gt;says on his blog&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;q cite="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/lessig/blog/archives/2002_12.shtml#000737"&gt;'Tis the season to be giving, and this will be a great gift to the Commons&lt;/q&gt;. If you haven't seen their explanatory flash animation, &lt;a href="http://mirrors.creativecommons.org/" title="Dubious permalink"&gt;Get Creative&lt;/a&gt;, you should really check it out.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That said, I have to admit I have a few reservations about the machine readable form of the &lt;acronym title="Creative Commons"&gt;CC&lt;/acronym&gt; licenses. The recommended way of including them in a page is &lt;acronym title="Resource Description Framework"&gt;RDF&lt;/acronym&gt; embedded in a comment, similar to Moveable Type's &lt;a href="http://www.movabletype.org/trackback/"&gt;Trackback&lt;/a&gt; system. This is fine for &lt;acronym title="HyperText Markup Language"&gt;HTML&lt;/acronym&gt; documents (although it feels like a bit of a cludge) but is problematic when used with &lt;acronym title="eXtensible HyperText Markup Language"&gt;XHTML&lt;/acronym&gt;. Why? Because &lt;acronym title="eXtensible HyperText Markup Language"&gt;XHTML&lt;/acronym&gt; documents are &lt;acronym title="eXtensible Markup Language"&gt;XML&lt;/acronym&gt; documents, and the &lt;acronym title="eXtensible Markup Language"&gt;XML&lt;/acronym&gt; specification &lt;a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#sec-comments" title="Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Second Edition) - Section 2.5: Comments"&gt;states&lt;/a&gt; that &lt;q cite="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#sec-comments"&gt;an XML processor may, but need not, make it possible for an application to retrieve the text of comments&lt;/q&gt;. The logical way of extracting Creative Commons information from an &lt;acronym title="eXtensible HyperText Markup Language"&gt;XHTML&lt;/acronym&gt; document would be to parse it with an &lt;acronym title="eXtensible Markup Language"&gt;XML&lt;/acronym&gt; processor, but it is likely that many processors will be unable to extract the comments (and even those with the ability to extract them will not treat them as &lt;acronym title="eXtensible Markup Language"&gt;XML&lt;/acronym&gt;, requiring a second run of the &lt;acronym title="eXtensible Markup Language"&gt;XML&lt;/acronym&gt; parser to extract information from the &lt;acronym title="Resource Description Framework"&gt;RDF&lt;/acronym&gt;). In practical terms this is unlikely to be a problem as regular expressions can be used instead, but from an idealogical point of view it leaves something of a bad taste in the mouth.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If I'm going to criticise the embedded &lt;acronym title="Resource Description Framework"&gt;RDF&lt;/acronym&gt; approach I should probably suggest an alternative. The HTML 4 specification &lt;a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/types.html#h-6.12" title="Basic HTML data types: 6.12 Link types"&gt;describes&lt;/a&gt; a "Copyright" link type which is defined as follows:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote cite="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/types.html#h-6.12"&gt;
&lt;dl&gt;
&lt;dt&gt;Copyright&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Refers to a copyright statement for the current document.&lt;/dd&gt;
&lt;/dl&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I suggest using a &lt;code&gt;link&lt;/code&gt; element in the &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;head&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt; section of a document which points to the Creative Commons license governing the page in question (or to an &lt;acronym title="Resource Description Framework"&gt;RDF&lt;/acronym&gt; document similar to that currently used by the embedded comments method). If you view source on your page you will see that I have done exactly that.&lt;/p&gt;
    
        &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/creative-commons"&gt;creative-commons&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/lawrence-lessig"&gt;lawrence-lessig&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
    

</summary><category term="creative-commons"/><category term="lawrence-lessig"/></entry><entry><title>Striking the 1976 act</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2002/Dec/9/strikingThe1976Act/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2002-12-09T12:18:45+00:00</published><updated>2002-12-09T12:18:45+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2002/Dec/9/strikingThe1976Act/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/lessig/blog/archives/2002_12.shtml#000670" title="chaos II -- these numbers are AMAZING!"&gt;Lawrence Lessig&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote cite="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/lessig/blog/archives/2002_12.shtml#000670"&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Jason Schultz has done more amazing work calculating any "chaos" that would come from striking the 1976 Act. Using the Internet Movie Database, he confirmed the Copyright Office's numbers that about 37,000 movies were released in the period 1927-46. (IMDb reports 36,386). Of those, only 2,480 are currently available in any format, or 6.8%. 93.2% of the films during that period are are commercially dormant.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
    
        &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/lawrence-lessig"&gt;lawrence-lessig&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
    

</summary><category term="lawrence-lessig"/></entry><entry><title>Free the mouse</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2002/Oct/7/freeTheMouse/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2002-10-07T13:48:33+00:00</published><updated>2002-10-07T13:48:33+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2002/Oct/7/freeTheMouse/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    &lt;p&gt;On Wednesday, Laurence Lessig will take on the Supreme Court in &lt;a href="http://eldred.cc/"&gt;Eldred v. Ashcroft&lt;/a&gt;. He will probably lose, but I sure hope he doesn't. Last night I watched Lessig's &lt;a href="http://randomfoo.net/oscon/2002/lessig/"&gt;&amp;lt;free culture&amp;gt;&lt;/a&gt; keynote presentation from OSCon (made available in Flash format by Leonard Lin) with my girlfriend, and I've been catching up on the case with this &lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/10.10/lessig.html" title="Lawrence Lessig&amp;apos;s Supreme Showdown"&gt;Wired article&lt;/a&gt; and MSNBC's &lt;a href="http://www.msnbc.com/news/817175.asp?cp1=1"&gt;Glitterati vs Geeks&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href="http://lessig.org/"&gt;Lessig's blog&lt;/a&gt; has some interesting links as well.&lt;/p&gt;
    
        &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/lawrence-lessig"&gt;lawrence-lessig&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
    

</summary><category term="lawrence-lessig"/></entry><entry><title>The Lessig debate</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2002/Aug/18/theLessigDebate/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2002-08-18T11:08:27+00:00</published><updated>2002-08-18T11:08:27+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2002/Aug/18/theLessigDebate/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    &lt;p&gt;I watched Laurence Lessig's &lt;acronym title="O&amp;apos;Reilly Open Source Convention"&gt;OSCON&lt;/acronym&gt; keynote the other day (an 8.4MB &lt;a href="http://randomfoo.net/oscon/2002/lessig/"&gt;Flash file&lt;/a&gt; courtesy of &lt;a href="http://randomfoo.net/"&gt;Leonard Lin&lt;/a&gt;). A transcript of the session is &lt;a href="http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/policy/2002/08/15/lessig.html" title="Lawrence Lessig Keynote from OSCON 2002 "&gt;also available&lt;/a&gt;. It was an excellent presentation and really opened my eyes to the issues facing intellectual property in the United States. It also appears to have raised some hackles - Dave Winer &lt;a href="http://scriptingnews.userland.com/backissues/2002/08/17#When:9:02:51AM"&gt;took offence&lt;/a&gt; to the implication that developers had not done anything about the problem, and Doc Searls has &lt;a href="http://doc.weblogs.com/2002/08/18#whoDoesWhat" title="Who does what"&gt;responded&lt;/a&gt; to Dave's criticism with some interesting background information on Lessig.&lt;/p&gt;
    
        &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/dave-winer"&gt;dave-winer&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/docsearls"&gt;docsearls&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/lawrence-lessig"&gt;lawrence-lessig&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/leonard-lin"&gt;leonard-lin&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
    

</summary><category term="dave-winer"/><category term="docsearls"/><category term="lawrence-lessig"/><category term="leonard-lin"/></entry></feed>