<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en-us" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Simon Willison's Weblog: meg-hourihan</title><link href="http://simonwillison.net/" rel="alternate"/><link href="http://simonwillison.net/tags/meg-hourihan.atom" rel="self"/><id>http://simonwillison.net/</id><updated>2002-06-15T11:01:47+00:00</updated><author><name>Simon Willison</name></author><entry><title>Meg on blogging</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2002/Jun/15/megOnBlogging/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2002-06-15T11:01:47+00:00</published><updated>2002-06-15T11:01:47+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2002/Jun/15/megOnBlogging/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    &lt;p&gt;Meg Hourihan: &lt;a href="http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/javascript/2002/06/13/megnut.html"&gt;What We're Doing When We Blog&lt;/a&gt;. It's a curious fact of blogdom that many bloggers blog blogging - why they do it, what it is and why it's so important. I feel Meg has nailed it with this article - blogging is defined by the format, not by the subject matter. She also makes some insightful comments about why the blogging format works so well:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Freed from the constraints of the printed page (or any concept of "page"), an author can now blog a short thought that previously would have gone unwritten. The weblog's post unit liberates the writer from word count.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
    
        &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/blogging"&gt;blogging&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/meg-hourihan"&gt;meg-hourihan&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
    

</summary><category term="blogging"/><category term="meg-hourihan"/></entry></feed>