<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en-us" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Simon Willison's Weblog: polls</title><link href="http://simonwillison.net/" rel="alternate"/><link href="http://simonwillison.net/tags/polls.atom" rel="self"/><id>http://simonwillison.net/</id><updated>2009-04-20T20:36:05+00:00</updated><author><name>Simon Willison</name></author><entry><title>Inside the precision hack</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2009/Apr/20/subverted/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2009-04-20T20:36:05+00:00</published><updated>2009-04-20T20:36:05+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2009/Apr/20/subverted/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://musicmachinery.com/2009/04/15/inside-the-precision-hack/"&gt;Inside the precision hack&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
How 4chan members subverted a Time.com online poll to reorder the options and spell out their own message. Partly poor application design from Time (the first version used a GET request without input validation), but I challenge anyone to design an anonymous online poll that can’t be fixed using the more sophisticated techniques 4chan eventually deployed based on HTTP proxies.


    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/4chan"&gt;4chan&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/polls"&gt;polls&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/security"&gt;security&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="4chan"/><category term="polls"/><category term="security"/></entry></feed>