<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en-us" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Simon Willison's Weblog: spdy</title><link href="http://simonwillison.net/" rel="alternate"/><link href="http://simonwillison.net/tags/spdy.atom" rel="self"/><id>http://simonwillison.net/</id><updated>2009-12-15T15:36:20+00:00</updated><author><name>Simon Willison</name></author><entry><title>HTTP + Politics = ?</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2009/Dec/15/australia/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2009-12-15T15:36:20+00:00</published><updated>2009-12-15T15:36:20+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2009/Dec/15/australia/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mnot.net/blog/2009/12/16/http_au"&gt;HTTP + Politics = ?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
Mark Nottingham ponders the technical implications of Australia’s decision to apply a filter to all internet traffic. Australia is large enough (and far enough away from the northern hemisphere) that the speed of light is a performance issue, but filtering technologies play extremely poorly with optimisation technologies such as HTTP pipelining and Google’s SPDY proposal.


    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/australia"&gt;australia&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/filtering"&gt;filtering&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/google"&gt;google&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/http"&gt;http&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/mark-nottingham"&gt;mark-nottingham&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/performance"&gt;performance&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/pipelining"&gt;pipelining&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/politics"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/spdy"&gt;spdy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="australia"/><category term="filtering"/><category term="google"/><category term="http"/><category term="mark-nottingham"/><category term="performance"/><category term="pipelining"/><category term="politics"/><category term="spdy"/></entry><entry><title>SPDY: The Web, Only Faster</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2009/Nov/13/spdy/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2009-11-13T13:00:08+00:00</published><updated>2009-11-13T13:00:08+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2009/Nov/13/spdy/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://alex.dojotoolkit.org/2009/11/spdy-the-web-only-faster/"&gt;SPDY: The Web, Only Faster&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
Alex Russell explains the benefits of Google’s SPDF proposal (a protocol that upgrades HTTP)—including header compression, multiplexing, the ability to send additional resources such as images and stylesheets down without needing the data:uri hack and Comet support built in to the core assumptions of the protocol.


    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/alex-russell"&gt;alex-russell&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/comet"&gt;comet&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/compression"&gt;compression&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/datauri"&gt;datauri&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/google"&gt;google&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/http"&gt;http&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/spdy"&gt;spdy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="alex-russell"/><category term="comet"/><category term="compression"/><category term="datauri"/><category term="google"/><category term="http"/><category term="spdy"/></entry></feed>